Who would win in a game of 2 on 2, Kobe Bryant & Steve Nash v.s. Michael Jordan & John Stock

I'd say MJ %26amp; Stockton all the way.....

Reasons:

8 NBA Finals combined

6 NBA Titles (per MJ)

8 Conference Titles combined

5 Steal titles combined

10 Scoring Titles (per MJ)

9 Assist Titles (per Stockton)

6 Finals MVP (per MJ)

5 Seaon MVP (per MJ)

3 Gold Medals combined

4X All-Star MVP combined

1 NCAA Title (per MJ)

1 Defensive Player of the Year award (per MJ)

Anyways, MJ %26amp; Stockton's stats speak for themselves. They'll blow Kobe %26amp; Nash away. MJ is a better scorer then Kobe %26amp; Stockton is a better assister then Nash. MJ %26amp; Stockton are better defenders as well.........

MJ %26amp; Stockton all away!

P.S. Out of the 4 only 3 of them are team players...and that's to bad for Nash because his teammate is the one that's not a team player!

KOBE BRYANT SUCKS!!!!!!!!

Who would win in a game of 2 on 2, Kobe Bryant %26amp; Steve Nash v.s. Michael Jordan %26amp; John Stockton (prime years)?nba live 2007

Kobe %26amp; Nash....Easy.

Who would win in a game of 2 on 2, Kobe Bryant %26amp; Steve Nash v.s. Michael Jordan %26amp; John Stockton (prime years)?nba betting ,nba teams

MJ %26amp; Stockton. Stockton is the all-time leader in steals and assists. And we all know what MJ can do scoring-wise.
looks like you answered your own question... good job
Stockton Jordan 60% of the games.

Nash and Kobe are really close to both these guys at their position. but the weak link is Nash's defense. i think Stockton can lock him down. if either Kobe or Jordan get hot this team will win though.
MJ Stockton, because MJ simply would not lose in his prime to a punk like Kobe. Nash is better than stockton though. and Yeah i agree with you Kobe sucks donkeys.
Bill Russell (11 rings) and Sam Jones (10 rings), with a total of 21 rings, would kick all of their a ss es.

They also combined for 23 conference titles, compared to 8 for Jordan/Stockton.

They knew how to win...all the time.

btw, which 3 are team players? I know Stockton and Nash are, but who else is?

http://airjudden2.tripod.com/jordan/inde...

http://airjudden2.tripod.com/ejf/indexf....
I notice you didn't put any effort into puting Kobe and Nash's stats up, not that stats matter in a 2on2 game anyway. Besides, the only reason Stockton got all those assists was because he was constantly dumping it down to Malone off pick and rolls.

Kobe and Nash would win. Nash is a more precise passer, not to mention a WAY better shooter, and Kobe is the better scorer. M.J. doesn't have the range or handles Kobe does.
kobe and nash

stockton is too old
What kind of question is that of course MJ and Stockton! Have you ever watched any of their all-star games. I bet you never even watched a game with MJ or Stockton in it. Thats like Areans and Shaq VS. Isaia Thomas and Malone! You are retarted you never even heard of the word NBA!
MJ STOCKTON

I like kobe and MJ matchup, but Nash is a team player, not much of anything else. Stockton could take him 1v1 thus giving it to MJ JS.
MJ and Nash is a better combination
They can play against each other 100 times and it would be close to even. They're all so talented that it'd be a toss up.